Next:ImplementaciónUp:Computational
experiments on thePrevious:Basic
definitions
Main facts
Proposition 3.1 (Necessity [3])
If an AS
is m-ideal for some m, then there is connected matroid
appropriate for .
The reciprocal requires an extra assumption:
Proposition 3.2 (Sufficiency [3])
Let q=pm be a prime power and let
be an AS. Suppose there is connected matroid
appropriate for .
If
is representable, then
is q-ideal.
Indeed, there is a beautiful characterization of universal-ideality:
Proposition 3.3 ([1])
An AS
is universally-ideal if and only if
is 2-ideal and 3-ideal.
Open problem
If there is a connected matroid
appropriate for an AS which is not representable over the field ,
decide whether the AS is q-ideal.
Regarding graphs, G=(V,E) let
be the collection of sets that include at least one edge:
Then the following conditions are pairwise equivalent:
-
1.
-
G=(V,E) is a multipartite graph, i.e. there is a partition
of V such that
-
2.
-
is I-ideal.
-
3.
-
.
-
4.
-
has an appropriate representable matroid.
Inmediately a procedure to build a SSS follows:
-
1.
-
Given a set of participants V and a collection ,
-
2.
-
decide whether
has an appropriate matroid ,
-
3.
-
if
is representable, then construct the corresponding SSS according to Shamir's
procedure.
We are building an experimentation computational system to deal with
the following problems:
-
1.
-
Representation of matroids.
-
2.
-
Random selection of a matroid over the whole possibilities to pick a matroid
over a ground set of n participants.
-
3.
-
Given a collection
whose elements are of the same cardinality, say k, decide whether
there is a matroid of rank k whose bases are the elements in .
-
4.
-
Decide whether a matroid is representable over a finite field.
-
5.
-
Specify a general procedure to build an ideal SSS provided a representable
matroid.
Next:ImplementaciónUp:Computational
experiments on thePrevious:Basic
definitions
Guillermo Morales-Luna
2000-11-28