next up previous contents
Next: splitting quaternions Up: Quaternions versus elementary matrices Previous: Quaternions versus elementary matrices

multiplication table

The best way to get at 2x2 matrices, is to use quaternions. Starting from the natural basis for 2x2 matrices,

\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}{cccc}
\begin{array}{rcl}
{\bf e}_{11} & = & ...
...0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array} \right].
\end{array}
\end{array} \end{displaymath}

whose rule of multiplication is ${\bf e}_{ij} {\bf e}_{kl} = \delta_{jk} {\bf e}_{il}$, quaternion-like matrices can be defined by

\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}{cccc}
\begin{array}{rcl}
{\bf 1}& = & \left...
... & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{array} \right].
\end{array}
\end{array} \end{displaymath}

In detail,

\begin{displaymath}{\bf 1}= {\bf e}_{11} + {\bf e}_{22},\ \ {\bf i}= {\bf e}_{12...
...}_{12} + {\bf e}_{21},\ \ {\bf k}= {\bf e}_{11} - {\bf e}_{22},\end{displaymath}

all built from sums and differences, thereby retaining real matrices. Like quaternions, these matrices anticommute (except for the identity). The ostensible difference is that only one square is $-{\bf 1}$, the others are $+{\bf 1}$, changing Euler's formula from trigonometric to hyperbolic functions according to the sign.

The multiplication table is

\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}{r\vert rrrr}
& {\bf 1}& {\bf i}& {\bf j}& {\b...
...}\\
{\bf k}& {\bf k}& {\bf j}& {\bf i}& {\bf 1}
\end{array}. \end{displaymath}

The usual way of performing algebraic operations on these matrices is to write a sum such as $a {\bf 1}+ b {\bf i}+ c {\bf j}+ d {\bf k}$ in the form $s + {\bf v}$, where $s = a {\bf 1}$ and ${\bf v}$ is the rest of the sum. One can adopt the custom of not writing an explicit ${\bf 1}$ in places where the meaning is clear.



root
2000-03-17