One of the things which can be done with the Möbius transformation

d w z + c w + b z + a |
= | 0 | (21) |

is to find relationships amongst the variables which do not depend on the coefficients of the transformation. One procedure is to try it out for four points, which is the number of coefficients, to get simultaneous equations.

d w_{1} z_{1} + c w_{1} + b z_{1} + a |
= | 0 | (22) |

d w_{2} z_{2} + c w_{2} + b z_{2} + a |
= | 0 | (23) |

d w_{3} z_{3} + c w_{3} + b z_{3} + a |
= | 0 | (24) |

d w_{4} z_{4} + c w_{4} + b z_{4} + a |
= | 0 | (25) |

The corresponding matrix equation,

can only hold when the determinant of the square matrix vanishes. That relationship invites a series of transformations which can ultimately produce the result

This quantity equates the cross ratioscross ratio of the two sets of numbers, and , it being that the cross ratio is an invariant of the Möbius transformation.

The equivalence of this result to the vanishing determinant is not immediately obvious, although it can be verified by careful attention to algebraic rearrangement. A line of reasoning which suggests a result which then can subsequently be confirmed begins with the fractional linear form of the Möbius transformation,

w |
= | (27) |

which clearly maps

w |
= | (28) |

which is one of the cross ratios in the invariant expression Eq 26. In fact, by setting up matching expressions in