Rule 110 as it relates to the presence of gliders
Harold V. McIntosh
Departamento de Aplicación de Microcomputadoras,
Instituto de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Puebla,
Apartado postal 461, 72000 Puebla, Puebla, México.January 29, 1999
revised, Wed Feb 17 19:39:02 GMT-0600 1999Abstract:
Recent correspondence in LifeMail dealt with the possiblity of ``universal computation'' using Wollfram's (2,1) cellular automaton Rule 110. While awaiting further details participants in the list were referred to an eight page prospectus written by Matthew Cook cataloging the known gliders for the rule. Some of the commentary surrounding his introduction is reproduced and elaborated here, namely the results of the survey of the properties of Rule 110 carried out via the cellular automaton program NXLCAU21.
Contents List of Figures List of Tables Overview Rule 110 as a consequence of triangular tiles The simplest mosaics according to Rule 110 T1 mosaic T2 mosaic T3 mosaic crystallography of the ether tile T4 mosaic T5 mosaic General properties of Rule 110 interpretation of graphs the de Bruijn diagrams cycle, or basin, diagrams ancestors and symbolic de Bruijn matrices subset diagram mean field probability Gliders not using the ether tile two right in five generations four left in six generations one left in six generations Cook's A-gliders, with forward velocity 2/3 c tiling approach de Bruijn approach non-existence of (4,6) A-bar gliders Cook's B-gliders, with backward velocity -c/2 tiling approach to the B gliders at -2 in 4 generations de Bruijn approach to the B gliders tiling by B-bar gliders at -6 in 12 generations Cook's C gliders, static with velocity 0 tiling approach de Bruijn approach Cook's D-gliders, forward velocity c/5 Cook's E-gliders, velocity -4/15 c ( -c/4) tiling approach to -4/15 gliders tiling approach to -8/30 gliders Cook's F-glider, backward velocity -c/9 Cook's G-gliders, backward velocity -c/3 Cook's H-glider, velocity -18/92 c ( -c/5) Cook's glider gun, velocity -20/77 ( -c/4). Glider collisions the A - B collision vanishes an A - C collision makes an F Acknowledgements References About this document ...
Harold V. McIntosh
E-mail:mcintosh@servidor.unam.mx